09/06/2025

The 7 Best Medical Billing Software Solutions for Cardiology Practices in 2025

Cardiology practices handling cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) and remote patient monitoring (RPM) programs face a pressing issue: complex billing requirements that directly impact financial performance. With new CPT/HCPCS codes and telehealth policies for 2025 still unclear, missed billable events, documentation errors, or compliance issues can cost significant revenue. Services like CPT 93298 for remote interrogations and CPT 99454, which requires at least 16 days of data transmission per billing cycle, add to the complexity.

Specialized medical billing software offers a practical fix by automating CPT code capture, securing compliance documentation, and boosting revenue from CIED and RPM services. These tools cut down on manual billing tasks and lower the risk of claim rejections. From pulling data together automatically to prioritizing critical alerts, the right software turns billing struggles into efficient, profitable workflows.

Many cardiology practices using platforms like Rhythm360 report up to a 300% increase in revenue capture through improved billing processes and strong compliance support. Reach out for a Rhythm360 demo now to see how automated CPT code capture can strengthen your practice's finances.

Why Cardiology Practices Need Strong Billing Software

Cardiology billing goes beyond standard medical services, demanding careful handling of specific CPT codes for device monitoring and remote patient management. CIED codes like 93296, 93297, and 93298 involve heavy staff time and resources that manual processes often miss. Similarly, RPM services need detailed records of patient consent, device setup, and daily data transmission to meet billing rules.

Older billing methods create gaps where revenue slips away. Technicians waste hours logging into different manufacturer portals, copying data by hand, and tracking billable events across scattered systems. This drains clinical time and raises the chance of missed payments or compliance errors. Managing patients with devices from multiple brands, such as Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Abbott, or Biotronik, only adds to the workload.

Rhythm360 solves these problems with a single, vendor-neutral platform that automatically records billable events from CIED transmissions and RPM services. Its AI-driven system achieves over 99.9% data transmissibility, essential for meeting the 16-day data requirement for CPT 99454, while producing audit-ready documentation. Practices using Rhythm360 have cut critical response times by up to 80% and increased revenue capture by as much as 300% through better CPT code billing. Contact us for a Rhythm360 demo to learn how automated billing can help your practice grow.

Top 7 Medical Billing Software Solutions for Cardiology in 2025

  1. Rhythm360
  2. Murj
  3. PaceMate
  4. Implicity
  5. Rhythm Management Group
  6. Octagos
  7. Paceart (Medtronic)

1. Rhythm360: All-in-One Billing and Monitoring Solution

Rhythm360, a cloud-based platform by RhythmScience, helps cardiology practices manage patients with CIEDs and chronic conditions like heart failure or hypertension. Its vendor-neutral design pulls data from all major device makers into one system, ensuring accurate documentation and CPT code compliance for better revenue capture.

Key Features

  • Automated CPT code tracking and documentation for CIED and RPM services, covering codes like 93298, 93299, 99453, 99454, and 99457, with over 99.9% data transmissibility.
  • Unified data view from manufacturers like Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Abbott, and Biotronik, cutting down on portal juggling.
  • AI-driven data handling across formats like APIs, HL7, XML, and PDFs, supporting billing accuracy and compliance.
  • Two-way EHR integration with systems like Epic, Cerner, and Athenahealth, minimizing manual entry errors.
  • Smart alerting to filter noise and prioritize urgent issues, shortening response times by up to 80%.
  • Full RPM support for chronic disease management with billing automation for related CPT codes.

Advantages

  • Boosts revenue capture by up to 300% through optimized billing.
  • Eases administrative workload by removing manual data tasks.
  • Delivers high data accuracy with AI and backup feeds.
  • Enhances patient care with timely, prioritized alerts.
  • Offers flexible, usage-based SaaS pricing.
  • Quick setup in days to weeks with minimal workflow disruption.

Limitations

  • Focused mainly on cardiology, not ideal for broader medical billing needs.
  • Requires initial EHR setup, though supported for ease.

Integrations

  • EHRs: Epic, Cerner, Athenahealth, eClinicalWorks, Greenway Health via HL7.
  • Device makers: Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Abbott, Biotronik, and others.
  • Communication: Twilio for patient messaging with audit trails.

Best Fit For

  • Cardiology practices aiming to increase revenue from CIED and RPM services.
  • Electrophysiology clinics needing streamlined device data handling.
  • Health systems seeking unified monitoring and compliance tools.
  • Practices managing CIED codes like 93296, 93297, and 93298.
  • Groups expanding RPM programs for heart failure and hypertension.

Get a Rhythm360 demo today to see how our platform can improve your billing efficiency and revenue capture.

2. Murj: Streamlined Device Clinic Workflows

Murj is a cloud-based tool built to automate workflows in device clinics for remote monitoring of CIEDs. It focuses on simplifying data management and reporting for technicians and clinicians, prioritizing operational ease.

Key Features

  • Automation for scheduling and patient follow-ups in device clinics.
  • Connection to various device programmers and data sources across manufacturers.
  • Reporting tools for compliant records and clinical reviews.

Advantages

  • Improves workflow efficiency for clinicians.
  • Provides an easy-to-use interface for multi-platform device data.
  • Cuts down on manual monitoring and coordination tasks.

Limitations

  • Limited focus on direct billing optimization or CPT code capture.
  • May need extra tools for full RPM billing beyond CIEDs.
  • Less emphasis on data transmissibility or redundancy for billing compliance.

Integrations

  • EHR systems and device programmers from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Abbott.
  • Clinical workflow management systems.

Best Fit For

  • Device clinic staff focused on workflow efficiency for CIED monitoring.
  • Practices prioritizing device data management over billing features.

3. PaceMate: Broad Device Data Integration

PaceMate provides a wide-ranging cardiac monitoring platform that combines data from all major device makers. After acquiring Medtronic's Paceart, it aims to unify solutions for practices moving from older systems, focusing on patient care and compliance in CIED management.

Key Features

  • Unified data access from multiple device manufacturers.
  • Tools to boost patient adherence to monitoring schedules.
  • Reporting and compliance support for medical records.

Advantages

  • Wide compatibility with devices from various makers.
  • Focus on patient compliance can improve monitoring rates.
  • Paceart acquisition helps transition legacy data and workflows.

Limitations

  • Ongoing Paceart integration may complicate transitions for current users.
  • Billing automation lacks detail for precise CPT capture.
  • Broader RPM services for conditions like heart failure receive less focus.

Integrations

  • All major device makers and various EHRs via standard interfaces.
  • Legacy Paceart data for transitioning practices.

Best Fit For

  • Practices with many device patients, especially those using Paceart previously.
  • Groups wanting consolidated CIED data with patient engagement focus.

4. Implicity: AI-Driven Alert Optimization

Implicity uses AI to improve remote monitoring of cardiac device patients by cutting down false positives and alert fatigue. This helps clinicians work more efficiently and supports accurate billing for review time.

Key Features

  • AI filters alerts to highlight critical events, easing clinician workload.
  • In-depth data collection from multiple devices with analytics.
  • Physician portal for efficient report review and decisions.

Advantages

  • Reduces alert fatigue, letting clinicians focus on key issues.
  • Strong data analytics aid clinical decision-making.
  • Boosts clinical efficiency, indirectly helping billing efforts.

Limitations

  • Direct billing automation may need separate revenue management tools.
  • Focuses on CIEDs, with less support for broader RPM billing needs.
  • Doesn't fully address data transmission or consent compliance for billing.

Integrations

  • Major device makers like Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Abbott, Biotronik.
  • Clinical workflow and reporting systems.

Best Fit For

  • Cardiologists wanting to cut alert overload for CIED patients.
  • Practices valuing clinical efficiency but needing separate billing tools.

5. Rhythm Management Group: Software and Service Combo

Rhythm Management Group combines remote monitoring software with optional clinical staff support for data review and reporting. This hybrid model suits practices with limited in-house resources for billing and device management.

Key Features

  • Software for aggregating and managing device data.
  • Optional outsourced monitoring by certified cardiac technicians.
  • Reporting and documentation with clinical oversight.

Advantages

  • Lowers in-house staffing needs for monitoring tasks.
  • Offers a complete solution with service support.
  • Supports compliance through consistent reviews and records.

Limitations

  • Dependence on external staff may reduce control over billing details.
  • Higher costs due to bundled services could affect profits.
  • Software lacks detailed billing automation for specific CPT codes.

Integrations

  • Device transmitters from various makers.
  • Clinical reporting systems.

Best Fit For

  • Practices wanting a full-service monitoring solution with staff support.
  • Smaller groups or those with turnover needing to offload operations.

6. Octagos: Efficient Data and EHR Integration

Octagos, a cloud-based tool, focuses on managing remote cardiovascular device data with strong two-way EHR integration and smart filtering. This helps practices handle large data volumes for billing and clinical needs.

Key Features

  • Two-way EHR integration for smooth data flow to patient records.
  • Smart filtering to prioritize actionable data, reducing workload.
  • Custom reports for summarizing data for reviews and billing.

Advantages

  • Solid EHR integration simplifies documentation efforts.
  • Reduces time on non-critical data review, boosting efficiency.
  • Cloud access works across multiple locations.

Limitations

  • Direct CPT code capture may still need manual input or added tools.
  • Interface could challenge users new to complex platforms.
  • Lacks strong focus on data transmissibility for billing compliance.

Integrations

  • Various EHRs and device makers.
  • Clinical workflow systems.

Best Fit For

  • Practices needing strong EHR links and data filtering for device monitoring.
  • Users valuing easy data access and efficient clinical workflows.

7. Paceart (Medtronic): Legacy Data Storage

Paceart, a traditional on-premise system, has long been used to organize cardiac device data, mainly for Medtronic products. While widely known, it lacks modern automation and compliance features needed for current cardiology billing.

Key Features

  • Data archiving and retrieval for Medtronic devices.
  • Basic reporting on patient device details.

Advantages

  • Well-known among long-term Medtronic users.
  • Reliable for storing historical data.

Limitations

  • Misses cloud access, real-time processing, and AI insights.
  • Requires heavy manual effort for billing, risking missed revenue.
  • Limited compatibility with modern EHRs, causing data isolation.
  • No direct billing automation for complex CPT codes.
  • Lacks support for broader RPM billing needs beyond devices.

Integrations

  • Mainly Medtronic devices, with minimal other system links.

Best Fit For

  • Practices sticking to on-premise archiving as a legacy tool.
  • Those prioritizing historical data over modern billing automation.

Comparing Features of 2025 Billing Software Options

Feature / Tool Rhythm360 Murj PaceMate Implicity Rhythm Management Group Octagos Paceart (Medtronic)
Automated CPT Code Capture & Optimization βœ… 🟑(Limited) 🟑(Limited) 🟑(Indirect) 🟑(Service-based) 🟑(Indirect) ❌
Vendor-Neutral Data Aggregation βœ… 🟒 βœ… βœ… 🟒 βœ… ❌
AI-Powered Data Reliability (>99.9% Transmissibility for Billing Compliance) βœ… 🟑 🟑 βœ… 🟑 βœ… ❌
Bi-directional EHR Integration βœ… βœ… βœ… βœ… 🟒 βœ… ❌
Multi-Modality RPM (HF/HTN & CIED Support for Billing) βœ… ❌(CIED focus) 🟑(CIED focus) ❌(CIED focus) βœ… ❌(CIED focus) ❌
Reduced Critical Alert Response Time (up to 80%) supporting timely billing βœ… 🟑 🟑 βœ… 🟑 🟑 ❌
Scalable SaaS Pricing βœ… βœ… βœ… βœ… 🟑(Bundled) βœ… ❌
24/7/365 On-demand CCT Oversight Option βœ… ❌ ❌ ❌ βœ… ❌ ❌

How Rhythm360 Stands Out for Cardiology Billing

Rhythm360 tackles key billing and efficiency challenges for cardiology practices, especially with uncertain CPT code and telehealth updates for 2025. Unlike Paceart, an outdated on-premise tool with no automation, Rhythm360 offers a cloud-based, AI-driven system. It automates CPT code capture and documentation, helping practices see up to a 300% revenue boost.

Against Murj, Rhythm360 excels with direct CPT code automation for both CIED and RPM, ensuring better revenue capture, especially for meeting CPT 99454's 16-day data rule. Compared to PaceMate, Rhythm360 adds AI data reliability and wider RPM support for diverse patient needs. While Implicity shines in alert filtering, Rhythm360 combines billing automation with broad CIED and RPM coverage.

Rhythm Management Group offers outsourced help, but Rhythm360 gives practices control with an intuitive in-house platform. Octagos has solid EHR ties, yet Rhythm360 ensures over 99.9% data transmissibility and thorough CPT code support for maximum revenue and compliance.

Common Questions on Medical Billing Software

How Does Software Support CPT Codes 93297 and 93298?

Tools like Rhythm360 automate tracking and documentation for remote interrogations under CPT 93298 and programming services under 93299. They capture billable events from CIED transmissions, ensure correct coding, and provide real-time tracking with compliance records to avoid missed payments and improve claim acceptance.

Can Software Improve RPM Compliance?

Yes, advanced billing software aids RPM compliance by automating tasks for CPT codes like 99453, 99454, and 99457. It tracks the required 16 days of data transmission for 99454, manages patient consent records, and logs physician interactions, helping reduce audit risks while capturing revenue.

What’s the Value of a Vendor-Neutral Billing Tool?

A vendor-neutral platform like Rhythm360 combines data from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Abbott, and Biotronik into one system. This avoids logging into multiple portals, ensures consistent billing across device types, and saves staff time on data retrieval.

How Soon Can Practices See Returns on Software Investment?

With Rhythm360, practices often notice benefits within 30 to 60 days. It cuts time on manual tasks and captures more billable events. Many report up to a 300% revenue increase from optimized billing and compliance documentation, with quick onboarding in days to weeks.

What Documentation Does Software Handle for Cardiac RPM?

Billing software automates RPM documentation, including patient consent, device setup records, daily transmission logs, and physician reviews. For CPT 99454, it verifies the 16-day data minimum per 30 days. It also logs interactions for CPT 99457 and maintains audit-ready reports.

Boost Your Revenue and Efficiency in 2025

Cardiology practices face real risks and opportunities in modern billing, especially with remote monitoring and device management. Scattered data, manual processes, and missed CPT codes drain finances. Evolving CPT/HCPCS codes and telehealth rules for 2025 make automated solutions even more critical for staying compliant.

AI-powered software like Rhythm360 turns these challenges into gains. It centralizes data from all device makers, automates coding and documentation, and adapts to regulatory shifts while increasing revenue. With a proven record of up to 300% revenue growth for practices, investing in advanced billing software becomes a smart move for growth.

Rhythm360 delivers a complete solution to reduce revenue loss and administrative hassle for cardiology practices. It fits into current workflows, handles complex billing tasks, and grows with your needs. Request a Rhythm360 demo today to explore how our platform can enhance your financial outcomes and patient care.