09/07/2025

5 Key Cardiac Data Management Platforms for US Medical Practices in 2025

Managing cardiac data in 2025 presents real challenges for US medical practices, from navigating fragmented OEM portals to handling remote patient monitoring (RPM) billing. This article breaks down five leading platforms designed for cardiac data, helping cardiology practices and health systems choose a solution to streamline operations, enhance patient care, and improve revenue. We'll cover essential features, benefits, drawbacks, and ideal scenarios for each, showing how a unified system can improve both clinical and financial results.

Why Cardiac Data Management Is Critical in 2025

With more cardiac device implants and remote monitoring services in use, practices face a growing volume of data. This often leads to fragmented systems and overwhelmed staff who must access multiple OEM portals, such as those from Medtronic or Abbott, for a single patient's information. Such manual efforts waste time and raise the risk of missing critical events or compliance issues.

Fragmentation also fuels alert fatigue and revenue loss. Clinicians get buried under irrelevant notifications, while tracking billable events for complex CPT codes like 93298 or 99454 becomes a struggle, impacting patient outcomes and income. Updated telehealth and remote monitoring codes for 2025 add further complexity to billing and compliance. A strong platform can address these issues by centralizing data and automating key tasks.

A robust cardiac data management platform simplifies these problems. It consolidates information, automates repetitive workflows, and uses AI to prioritize urgent alerts. Practices adopting such tools often see response times for critical alerts drop by up to 80% and revenue increase by as much as 300% through better billing. Interested in unifying your data and improving workflows? Reach out for a demo with Rhythm360 to explore the impact.

Top Cardiac Data Management Platforms for 2025

Navigating the range of software options for cardiac data can be daunting. Below, we detail five notable platforms for 2025, focusing on their ability to optimize clinical and financial outcomes for cardiology practices.

1. Rhythm360
2. Murj
3. PaceMate
4. Implicity
5. Octagos

1. Rhythm360: A Unified Solution for Cardiac Data Challenges

Rhythm360, created by RhythmScience, offers a cloud-based platform tailored for cardiac data management. It serves as a vendor-neutral system for remote monitoring of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices (CIEDs) and chronic conditions like Heart Failure (HF) and Hypertension (HTN). By integrating data from major device makers and providing clinical automation, AI-driven alerting, and billing support, Rhythm360 helps practices overcome data silos and boost revenue.

Key Features:

  • Unified platform capturing data from all CIEDs and sensors like CardioMEMS.
  • Support for HF and HTN monitoring with billing automation for CPT codes. Includes codes like 99453, 99454, and 99457 for RPM services.
  • AI ensures over 99.9% data accuracy by processing varied formats, including PDFs.
  • Near-real-time alerts and reports, with optional 24/7 clinical oversight.
  • Communication tools for automated patient messaging with audit trails.

Benefits:

  • Combines all OEM data into one clear dashboard.
  • Cuts critical alert response time by up to 80% with AI prioritization.
  • Boosts revenue by up to 300% through automated billing capture.
  • Quick onboarding, often completed in days to weeks, with flexible pricing.
  • HIPAA-compliant mobile app for remote access and coordination.

Drawbacks:

  • Initial setup needed for EHR integration, though streamlined.
  • Learning curve for practices used to manual processes.

Integrations:

  • EHRs: Epic, Cerner, Athenahealth, and more via HL7.
  • Devices: Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Abbott, Biotronik, and others.
  • Communication: Twilio for messaging and call tracking.

Best Fit For:

  • Practices juggling multi-vendor CIED data.
  • Electrophysiology clinics aiming to reduce alert fatigue.
  • Health systems needing a single platform for CIED and chronic RPM.
  • Facilities focused on revenue growth through RPM billing.
  • Teams prioritizing timely responses to critical patient alerts.

Want to streamline your cardiac data and increase profitability? Contact Rhythm360 for a demo and see the difference.

2. Murj: Simplifying Cardiac Device Workflows

Murj provides a cloud-based platform focused on automating workflows for cardiac device data. It helps practices improve efficiency in reviewing implantable device transmissions, making it a practical choice for targeted data management needs.

Key Features:

  • Automation for reviewing device data.
  • Standardized reporting across device types.
  • Tools for patient management and scheduling.
  • Some EHR system connections.

Benefits:

  • Enhances efficiency in processing device data.
  • Accessible through the cloud.
  • Focuses on clinical workflow improvement.

Drawbacks:

  • Limited AI capabilities for alert prioritization compared to others.
  • Integration may not cover all OEMs as fully as vendor-neutral systems.
  • Less focus on broader RPM beyond CIEDs, such as HF or HTN.

Integrations:

  • Selected EHR systems.
  • Major device makers, though full vendor-neutrality isn’t detailed.

Best Fit For:

  • Practices targeting better CIED data review processes.
  • Clinics needing a cloud solution for device follow-ups.
  • Teams seeking automation for routine data handling.

3. PaceMate: Bridging Legacy and Modern Cardiac Data Needs

PaceMate offers a cloud-based platform for cardiac data, recently strengthened by acquiring Paceart from Medtronic. It focuses on managing remote device data while connecting older systems to current cloud technology, supporting practices in transition.

Key Features:

  • Cloud system for remote cardiac monitoring.
  • Compatibility with various device makers.
  • Tools for reporting and documentation.
  • Expertise in CIED data via Paceart acquisition.

Benefits:

  • Blends cloud features with legacy system experience.
  • Works to unify data from multiple device types.
  • Scalable for expanding practices.

Drawbacks:

  • Integration of Paceart may still cause temporary issues.
  • Primary focus on CIEDs, potentially lacking HF/HTN RPM support.
  • AI and data accuracy features may not match top competitors.

Integrations:

  • Device makers, including Paceart-supported ones.
  • EHR connections, with varying details.

Best Fit For:

  • Practices moving from Paceart to cloud systems.
  • Cardiology groups needing solid CIED monitoring.
  • Clinics wanting a mix of legacy and modern data tools.

4. Implicity: AI-Driven Alerts for Cardiac Device Data

Implicity uses AI to manage cardiac device data remotely, emphasizing alert filtering to lighten clinician workloads and improve care focus. Its strength in intelligent prioritization suits practices with high alert volumes.

Key Features:

  • AI filters non-urgent device alerts.
  • Automated review of remote transmissions.
  • Dashboard for assessing patient risk levels.
  • Connections to device types and some EHRs.

Benefits:

  • Reduces alert fatigue with AI filtering.
  • Highlights clinically relevant events.
  • Cuts down manual review time for efficiency.

Drawbacks:

  • Limited scope in broader practice features like billing support.
  • Data handling may not include advanced validation methods.

Integrations:

  • Major CIED manufacturers.
  • Selected EHR systems.

Best Fit For:

  • Practices overwhelmed by frequent device alerts.
  • Clinicians needing AI to focus on key patient data.
  • Teams aiming to streamline device review efforts.

5. Octagos: Efficient Data Flow with EHR Focus

Octagos prioritizes AI filtering of non-urgent transmissions and strong EHR integration for cardiac device management. It supports seamless data exchange and workflow efficiency for data-heavy practices.

Key Features:

  • AI filters remote device transmissions.
  • Robust bi-directional EHR connectivity.
  • Patient monitoring and reporting tools.
  • Designed for effective data handling.

Benefits:

  • Smooth EHR integration enhances data flow.
  • AI reduces alert overload.
  • Improves clinical workflow efficiency.

Drawbacks:

  • May not fully unify OEM data into one view, requiring some portal access.
  • Lacks extensive communication or multi-service billing tools.

Integrations:

  • Multiple EHRs with bi-directional support.
  • Various cardiac device makers.

Best Fit For:

  • Practices valuing deep EHR integration.
  • Clinics needing AI to filter device data.
  • Teams focused on data exchange with health records.

Comparing Cardiac Data Platforms: Quick Overview

To assist in choosing a suitable cardiac data management platform, this table compares critical features across the five options, aligning with modern cardiology practice needs.

Feature Rhythm360 Murj PaceMate Implicity Octagos
Vendor-Neutral Data Unification ✓ Combines all major OEM data into one dashboard using API, HL7, and more. Partial support, may not fully unify dashboards. Supports many OEMs via Paceart, but unification varies. Supports major CIEDs. Supports devices, may need manual steps for full aggregation.
AI-Powered Alert Triage ✓ Filters noise, prioritizes events, cuts response time by 80%. Some alert management, limited AI focus. Alert support, less AI emphasis. ✓ Strong AI for filtering non-urgent alerts. Focuses on AI filtering for transmissions.
Multi-Modality RPM (CIED, HF, HTN) ✓ Full support for CIEDs and HF/HTN with CPT code billing. Focus on CIEDs only. Focus on CIEDs only. Focus on CIEDs only. Focus on CIEDs only.
Automated Billing Support ✓ Captures billable events, boosts revenue by up to 300%. Limited billing automation beyond reports. Some billing help, less optimized for RPM. Focus on clinical tasks, not billing. Billing may need manual effort.
Data Reliability ✓ Over 99.9% accuracy with AI and redundant feeds. Standard transmission. Standard transmission. Standard transmission. Standard transmission.
Communication Hub ✓ Automated messaging with audit trail via Twilio. Limited or no communication tools. Limited or no communication tools. Limited or no communication tools. Limited or no communication tools.
Bi-Directional EHR Integration ✓ Deep integrations, set up in days to weeks. Available, but support and speed vary. Available, efficiency and time vary. Available, support and speed vary. ✓ Strong EHR connectivity.
Mobile App for Clinicians ✓ Secure app for remote access and coordination. Not highlighted. Not highlighted. Not highlighted. Not highlighted.
Onboarding Time Days to weeks Weeks to months Weeks to months Weeks to months Weeks to months

How Rhythm360 Stands Out for Cardiac Data Needs

Rhythm360 Compared to Legacy Tools Like Paceart

Unlike older, on-premise systems such as Paceart, Rhythm360 delivers a cloud-based, AI-driven platform. It removes the burden of manual data transfers and separate OEM portals. While Paceart was once a staple, it lacks the real-time unification, smart alerting, and billing automation needed today. A modern solution like Rhythm360 prepares practices for future demands.

Rhythm360 Against Competitors Like Murj and PaceMate

Murj and PaceMate provide capable cloud options for device monitoring, but Rhythm360 excels with true vendor-neutral data integration and broader RPM support. It achieves over 99.9% data accuracy and extends services to HF and HTN monitoring with automated billing, offering a complete approach to care and revenue.

Rhythm360 Versus AI-Centric Platforms Like Implicity and Octagos

Implicity shines in alert filtering, and Octagos in EHR integration, yet Rhythm360 blends these strengths with wider functionality. Its AI reduces alert fatigue while ensuring accurate billing capture. A secure mobile app lets clinicians act on data anytime, adding flexibility for busy teams.

Common Questions on Cardiac Data Management Platforms

What Challenges Do Practices Face with Cardiac Device Data in 2025?

Key issues include fragmented data across OEM portals, heavy administrative tasks from manual entry, alert overload from irrelevant notices, and missed revenue due to poor billing capture. Using separate systems for manufacturers like Medtronic or Abbott wastes time, risks missing urgent events, and leads to unbilled services. Tools like Rhythm360 unify data and automate processes to address these inefficiencies.

How Does a Platform Improve Practice Revenue?

By automating billing for CPT codes and providing compliant records, platforms prevent missed payments and claim denials. They track billable activities for codes like 99453 or 99457, reducing errors and ensuring audit readiness. Practices using Rhythm360 report revenue growth of up to 300% through precise billing and documentation.

What Does Vendor-Neutrality Mean for Cardiac Data Systems?

Vendor-neutrality allows a platform to integrate data from all major device makers, like Boston Scientific or Biotronik, and even unstructured formats like PDFs. This cuts down on logging into multiple portals, reduces silos, and offers a single patient data view. Rhythm360 uses APIs, HL7, and AI to ensure complete data capture from any source.

How Can Rhythm360 Help with Alert Fatigue?

Rhythm360 uses AI to filter and prioritize significant device alerts, cutting through routine noise to highlight critical issues like device malfunctions. This lowers the volume of irrelevant notifications, improves response times by up to 80%, and helps clinicians focus on patients needing urgent care.

What Billing and Compliance Support Does a Platform Offer?

A solid platform automates documentation to meet CMS rules for RPM, tracking billable events and maintaining detailed logs for audits. It covers setup, data review, and patient management tied to specific CPT codes, ensuring claims are supported and practices stay compliant with changing telehealth rules.

Strengthen Your Practice with Better Cardiac Data Tools

Cardiac care continues to evolve with rising needs for effective data management, reliable remote monitoring, and accurate billing. Fragmented information and admin burdens pose real hurdles, but the right software turns these into chances for clinical and financial improvement.

Opting for a vendor-neutral, comprehensive platform tailored to cardiology's complexities is vital for patient care and practice stability in 2025. Among the tools reviewed, Rhythm360 combines efficiency, revenue support, and unified data handling effectively.

Rhythm360 helps cardiology practices tackle data silos, minimize alert fatigue, and increase income from remote monitoring. It streamlines workflows so your team can prioritize care. Want to see the benefits firsthand? Contact Rhythm360 for a demo today.